England, France, Italy. Proverbial heavyweights of Europe are going home in disgrace to devestated fans and more questions than answers, the most prominent of which is how this happened? Players like Ribery, Lampard, Rooney, Pirlo, De Rossi, Gerrard and Malouda shouldn’t be struggling against the likes of Algeria, Slovakia and South Africa. 2010 marks a turning point for Europe. Out of the 13 nations that qualified for the finals, only five made it to the round of 16. Juxtapose that with Asia, who got two out of four teams through, CONCACAF, who got two out of three, and CONEMBOL, in which all five nations advanced. The traditional model isn’t working and steps must be taken.
Step one, learn some humility. After a 0–0 draw against Algeria, England skipper Steven Gerrard said “This was like their [The Algerians] World Cup Final.” Actually, it was a group game for a team hoping to advance to the knockout rounds, same as England. That kind of arrogance is precisley why England looked unmotivated, unprepared and absolutely dire against a team with a lot less individual talent but played as a unit rather than individuals. The talent gap around the world is closing. Teams from Asia, North America, Africa and even Oceania are making pushes to be more than seat fillers at the World Cup. Gone are the days of the traditional powerhouses coasting through the group stages with all nine points and not facing a real test until the quarterfinals. It’s not that Europe is getting worse, it’s that the rest of the world is getting better.
Step two, invest in youth. After England’s 4–1 catastrophe against archrivals Germany in the second round the British press decried the death of the proverbial “Golden Generation” and the lack of young talent making it’s way into English football. The Premier League is made up of 73% foreign players and the FA has yet to show the competence of developing talent since succeeding control of the EPL in the early 90’s. No longer is the EPL the catalyst for nurturing young, English players. Africa, South America, and Asia have emerged as fertile talent grounds for rich teams and England’s top clubs make no secret about their lack of loyalty to the country’s national team.
The same goes for some of Italy’s top clubs. There are very few Italian stars at the top clubs in Serie A. Inter Milan is made up almost exclusively of foreign players and the one Italian club with a plethora of Italian players, Juventus, is coming off an abysmal season. These leagues are too powerful and too lucrative for the national associations to challenge so what they must do is develop talent independently, using competitions such as the U-17 and U-20 World Cups. England’s U-20 squad hasn’t played an international friendly since the conclusion of the U-20 World Cup over eight months ago. Italy barely has a U-20 side and same goes for France. Focusing only on the U-21 European Championships demonstrates the same European elitism mentioned earlier. The club and international facets of the game are becoming increasingly disparate and, for England, having one of the top leagues in the world is becoming a hindrance rather than a benefit.
Step three, there is no I in team. If France showed us anything this year is that talent means jack unless combined with teamwork and cohesion. Playing well as a team starts with the manager. Fabio Capello’s strict disciplinary style may have worked well during qualification, when players only had to spend a few days with each other but it obviously grew old after three weeks in close quarters. If you look at Argentina, the talent is matched by a manager who knows how to deal with his players. Diego Maradona might have been something of a circus during the qualification rounds but knows how to take star players and make them work well within a system. Just because a player is individually talented doesn’t mean that he’ll help his team. Dunga left Ronaldhino home much to the dismay of the Brazilian public but he simply didn’t fit into Dunga’s system and the move seems to be paying off. Maybe Capello or Lippi should have taken a good, hard look at players like Cannavaro and John Terry.
And finally, lower your expectations. It is only a matter of time before nations from outside Europe and South America starting challenging for the World Cup. When that happens the teams that have a legitimate shot at the title will grow from seven or eight to well over a dozen at the beginning of every tournament. That means the odds for England, France and Italy will become longer and a spot in the quarterfinals might be as far as they can go. The days of the soccer superpowers are gone, and never to return.
So why is humiliation a good thing for countries with proud soccer traditions? Because, finally, change is the only option.
You can follow John Boschini on Twitter at Twitter.com/Johnbo01
loading…







9 comments… read them below or add one
I generally agree, but let’s get a couple of facts straight. Europe had 6/13 not 5/13: Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, Slovakia, Germany, England. Maybe a small point, but it’s much closer to the 1:2 ratio that one would hope for.
Also, it is not a problem for “Europe”, but for countries with Europe’s big leagues, esp Italy and England. You make the same error that you are complaining about when you discount the many good sides from the second tier in Europe.
Since we are on the “the rest of the world is so much better than their reputation compared to Europe”, can we please call out Africa for yet another WC in which only one of their 5 (this year an amazing 6) get through. I’m pretty sure Africa has never had more than 1 make it to the round of 16. Let’s not use this kind of analysis to diminish European berths into the WC. If anyone should lose some this time it should finally be CAF — 3 rather than 5 seems fair. And the funny thing is, the extra berths should go to CONMEBOL, and then UEFA based on rankings and ability of teams.
Let’s also not rule out that this could just be a “down year” for Europe. After two spectacular cups WC 2006 and Euro 2008, there very well may have been a complacency setting in on sides that had some success.
Yes, England and Italy and to a lesser extent France, Spain, Netherlands and Germany are all victims of their leagues success. And the thing is I don’t think investment at the youth level will work. What needs to happen never will. Sides should be forced to play a certain number of natives — Unless that happens, the talent will follow the money and national players will have a higher bar to top when trying to play in the big domestic leagues.
David,
You make some good points but I think Asia deserves an extra spot and this could be done without changing the allocation of any other confederation. It’s quite simple move New Zealand and the few other small islands to Asia and give Asia the half spot which is disputed by both an Asian team and the winner of Oceania group which will be the Kiwis for a very long, long time.
As for European teams, it’s a common trend for Europeans to struggle outside Europe. Italy’s 4 titles came in Europe. France’s title came at home. England’s at home. Germany’s titles came in Europe as well.
South American teams tend to be the ones winning away from their Confederation as Brazil showed in WC2002 or in Sweden 1958.
In this tournament, the South American teams have been the best so far and if anything CONMEBOL deserves an extra spot like you mentioned. I’d take it away not from Africa but from CONCACAF as other than the USA and Mexico the other teams are poor.
As for the struggles of England, Italy and France those reasons are somewhat unrelated! England never really been a force with the only WC title coming at home some 44 years ago which puts them on level with France. England’s only big star is Rooney and he failed miserably in this WC. He has to be the tournament’s biggest disappointment and as he showed nothing in terms of the hunger and passion he displays for Man Utd. The other England player are mediocre at best with perhaps only Gerrard considered a quality player.
As for France, they’ve had many personal conflicts and the team was divided into groups within the squad itself. Gallas is also known for being a bad teammate in terms of his attitude as we’ve witnessed during his stint with Arsenal. The players did not get along with local duo Govou and Gourcuff who still play in France and Henry’s presence in the squad but mostly to warm the bench was controversial. And to make matters even worse, France had the worst Coach in the tournament in Raymond Domenech!
As for Italy, the Coach made a mistake by excluding one or perhaps two from Balotelli, Cassano, G. Rossi, Miccoli or even Totti. Marcello Lippi trusted too much in F. Cannavaro who was way past his best in Serie A while he was hit with key injuries to Buffon and Pirlo. If Buffon’s healthy, then Italy would probably have not conceded the other 4 goals on 5 shots on target. He’d probably save at least one of those 3 goals conceded against Slovakia.
There are different reasons for the struggles of these teams. While in England the media built the Three Lions to be a fierce monster prior to the World Cup, the Italian press clearly belittled and rightfully spoke of the Azzurri weaknesses. There’s a big difference there.
Finally, Italy have no influx of foreign born players or players with parents with mixed heritage or those who were born on home soil but of different background. Only Balotelli qualifies as one while France is full of them. Check how Desailly is following Ghana while Zidane was dividing his time between France and Algeria. The Germans who are still in the tournament have a number of those players and without them Germany would have probably not qualified for the WC. Just check Klose and Podolski (Poland), Cacau (Brazil), Ozil, Khedira and J. Boateng.
I am West African; I’m from Ghana. I agree with the comment in the blog; “Learn some humility.” In general, on the world cup stage, the wealth of a country is not necessarily directly proportional to the football talent of its team/players. I am pretty sure the USA vastly underestimated the Ghanaian team (again), because they come from a poverty-stricken African country. Africa and Africans do not get respect for much. Granted, Ghana is not a football powerhouse like Brazil or Argentina, but if you look in the history books for the African Cup of Nations, and the FIFA junior under 17 and under-20 World Cups (which Ghana won most recently, BTW), we have featured quite prominently.
Moreover, when you look into the European Club teams, you will find quite a few Africans playing in some of the best teams in Europe, side-by-side with highly-regarded Europeans and South Americans; yet, no respect.
David, as to your comment “I’m pretty sure Africa has never had more than 1 make it to the round of 16,” that is true-per each world cup-, but we are getting better. So far, African countries have made it to the quarterfinals of the World Cup 3 times: Cameroon in 1990 (beating Colombia and Argentina on the way); Senegal in 2002 (beating France on the way), and now Ghana (beating favorites USA in R16). It is tough for us to get the resources to get these players back from Europe, to put these teams together, and pay the coaches, but it comes together. For many African countries, their chance to be seen (positively) on the world stage is the World Cup. That is also a chance for little boys (and girls) to cheer their countries on, and to temporarily put aside the daily worries and stress, and focus on something positive.
My uncle owns & coaches a youth team in Ghana, and I see talent come through his house and on the field every day. There is only so much money available to develop these guys’ talents. He still has been able to get some of these youngs guys out of abject poverty, to playing professional football and making a living for themselves and their families. So, there is a lot of talent in Africa; just look at the European club-and national- teams. Resources are being stretched to develop this talent at home, so I don’t think those 5 spots-for close to a billion people and 50+ countries-is a waste.
This is just my 2 cents as an avid female football fan.
I see no proof that the US underestimated the Ghana team this time around. Is there any video, quotes or anything that shows a USMNT player or coach underestimating the game? Since Ghana sent the US packing back in 2006 it’s really hard to make that case. I think most people consider Ghana the best team in Africa from the last 2 world cups. Most likely, they will be an African favorite in the next.
Matt D, thanks for your comment. You are right; I do not recall any players or Bradley making any such comment. However, I don’t think it is a secret that the US was expected to win this one without much difficulty. There was a controversial goal for Ghana in the 2006 game that was thought to have given us a lucky win. I have listened to Lalas and other soccer commenters analyze the game; no one gave much credit to Ghana; the blame is largely placed on Bradley for not fielding the best/right players, and “fortuitous” Ghana goals being scored as a result of “US defender mistakes”. What goal isn’t typically a result of an opportunity due to a slip in defence? Anyway, that is now in the past. Ghana has a big game tomorrow. No doubt we are the underdogs-rightly so, Uruguay is a good side. I hope we can fight our way out of this one, win, and go to the semis. If not, good luck to Uruguay against Brazil. I think it would be fun to see countries other than Germany, France, Brazil, Argentina, or Italy contend seriously for the title.
Go Ghana!!!!
Matt & Adjoa,
Ghana is the most promising amongst the African nations in terms of talent (whether teams were in World Cup or not) and the Ghanaians showed it by reaching the Final of the African Cup of Nations and losing by a slim margin to the experienced Egyptians. While Egypt is perhaps Africa’s most balanced side today, the future will probably belong to Ghana as nations such as Cameroon and Nigeria are no longer the force they used to be.
To Ghana’s advantage, the key players on the Egyptian team are approaching retirement age while Ghana played both in the African tournament and the World Cup without M. Essien.
I even said before the WC2010 started that the absence of Essien wouldn’t affect the teams because the squad is made up of a group of players who work hard for the team.
The updated list below has Ghana on the poll and if you feel Ghana might win, you can vote here for the team:
http://www.worldcupbuzz.com/world-cup-2010-update-on-tournament-favourites/
It’s not looking like such a bad year for Europe at the semi-final stage, is it?
But they are sides that haven’t been powerhouses on the international stage before now. The Netherlands and Spain haven’t won a World Cup and Germany is the model for how to invest in youth and have a healthy relationship with their club league.
Hi John,
Perhaps Spain or the Dutch will finally get to stitch a star to their shirts! Germans are the most consistent team in the history of the World Cup because they often seem to produce efficient, effective, hard working and solid sides.