Why South Africa 2010 Is The Best Thing That Could Have Happened To Europe

by John Boschini on June 28, 2010 · 9 comments

England fans react during their World Cup soccer match against Germany while watching on a large screen at the Glastonbury Festival 2010 in southwest England, June 27, 2010. Glastonbury, one of the largest open-air music festivals, celebrates its 40th anniversary this year. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor (BRITAIN - Tags: ENTERTAINMENT SOCIETY)

Eng­land, France, Italy. Prover­bial heavy­weights of Europe are going home in dis­grace to deves­tated fans and more ques­tions than answers, the most promi­nent of which is how this hap­pened? Play­ers like Ribery, Lam­pard, Rooney, Pirlo, De Rossi, Ger­rard and Mal­ouda shouldn’t be strug­gling against the likes of Alge­ria, Slo­va­kia and South Africa. 2010 marks a turn­ing point for Europe. Out of the 13 nations that qual­i­fied for the finals, only five made it to the round of 16. Jux­ta­pose that with Asia, who got two out of four teams through, CONCACAF, who got two out of three, and CONEMBOL, in which all five nations advanced. The tra­di­tional model isn’t work­ing and steps must be taken.

Step one, learn some humil­ity. After a 0–0 draw against Alge­ria, Eng­land skip­per Steven Ger­rard said “This was like their [The Alge­ri­ans] World Cup Final.” Actu­ally, it was a group game for a team hop­ing to advance to the knock­out rounds, same as Eng­land. That kind of arro­gance is pre­cis­ley why Eng­land looked unmo­ti­vated, unpre­pared and absolutely dire against a team with a lot less indi­vid­ual tal­ent but played as a unit rather than indi­vid­u­als. The tal­ent gap around the world is clos­ing. Teams from Asia, North Amer­ica, Africa and even Ocea­nia are mak­ing pushes to be more than seat fillers at the World Cup. Gone are the days of the tra­di­tional pow­er­houses coast­ing through the group stages with all nine points and not fac­ing a real test until the quar­ter­fi­nals. It’s not that Europe is get­ting worse, it’s that the rest of the world is get­ting better.

Step two, invest in youth. After England’s 4–1 cat­a­stro­phe against archri­vals Ger­many in the sec­ond round the British press decried the death of the prover­bial “Golden Gen­er­a­tion” and the lack of young tal­ent mak­ing it’s way into Eng­lish foot­ball. The Pre­mier League is made up of 73% for­eign play­ers and the FA has yet to show the com­pe­tence of devel­op­ing tal­ent since suc­ceed­ing con­trol of the EPL in the early 90’s. No longer is the EPL the cat­a­lyst for nur­tur­ing young, Eng­lish play­ers. Africa, South Amer­ica, and Asia have emerged as fer­tile tal­ent grounds for rich teams and England’s top clubs make no secret about their lack of loy­alty to the country’s national team.

The same goes for some of Italy’s top clubs. There are very few Ital­ian stars at the top clubs in Serie A. Inter Milan is made up almost exclu­sively of for­eign play­ers and the one Ital­ian club with a plethora of Ital­ian play­ers, Juven­tus, is com­ing off an abysmal sea­son. These leagues are too pow­er­ful and too lucra­tive for the national asso­ci­a­tions to chal­lenge so what they must do is develop tal­ent inde­pen­dently, using com­pe­ti­tions such as the U-17 and U-20 World Cups. England’s U-20 squad hasn’t played an inter­na­tional friendly since the con­clu­sion of the U-20 World Cup over eight months ago. Italy barely has a U-20 side and same goes for France. Focus­ing only on the U-21 Euro­pean Cham­pi­onships demon­strates the same Euro­pean elit­ism men­tioned ear­lier. The club and inter­na­tional facets of the game are becom­ing increas­ingly dis­parate and, for Eng­land, hav­ing one of the top leagues in the world is becom­ing a hin­drance rather than a benefit.

Step three, there is no I in team. If France showed us any­thing this year is that tal­ent means jack unless com­bined with team­work and cohe­sion. Play­ing well as a team starts with the man­ager. Fabio Capello’s strict dis­ci­pli­nary style may have worked well dur­ing qual­i­fi­ca­tion, when play­ers only had to spend a few days with each other but it obvi­ously grew old after three weeks in close quar­ters. If you look at Argentina, the tal­ent is matched by a man­ager who knows how to deal with his play­ers. Diego Maradona might have been some­thing of a cir­cus dur­ing the qual­i­fi­ca­tion rounds but knows how to take star play­ers and make them work well within a sys­tem. Just because a player is indi­vid­u­ally tal­ented doesn’t mean that he’ll help his team. Dunga left Ronald­hino home much to the dis­may of the Brazil­ian pub­lic but he sim­ply didn’t fit into Dunga’s sys­tem and the move seems to be pay­ing off. Maybe Capello or Lippi should have taken a good, hard look at play­ers like Can­navaro and John Terry.

And finally, lower your expec­ta­tions. It is only a mat­ter of time before nations from out­side Europe and South Amer­ica start­ing chal­leng­ing for the World Cup. When that hap­pens the teams that have a legit­i­mate shot at the title will grow from seven or eight to well over a dozen at the begin­ning of every tour­na­ment. That means the odds for Eng­land, France and Italy will become longer and a spot in the quar­ter­fi­nals might be as far as they can go. The days of the soc­cer super­pow­ers are gone, and never to return.

So why is humil­i­a­tion a good thing for coun­tries with proud soc­cer tra­di­tions? Because, finally, change is the only option.

You can fol­low John Bos­chini on Twit­ter at Twitter.com/Johnbo01

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
Why South Africa 2010 Is The Best Thing That Could Have Hap­pened To Europe, 4.9 out of 5 based on 10 ratings

9 comments… read them below or add one

1 David June 29, 2010 at 10:15 am

I generally agree, but let’s get a couple of facts straight. Europe had 6/13 not 5/13: Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, Slovakia, Germany, England. Maybe a small point, but it’s much closer to the 1:2 ratio that one would hope for.

Also, it is not a problem for “Europe”, but for countries with Europe’s big leagues, esp Italy and England. You make the same error that you are complaining about when you discount the many good sides from the second tier in Europe.

Since we are on the “the rest of the world is so much better than their reputation compared to Europe”, can we please call out Africa for yet another WC in which only one of their 5 (this year an amazing 6) get through. I’m pretty sure Africa has never had more than 1 make it to the round of 16. Let’s not use this kind of analysis to diminish European berths into the WC. If anyone should lose some this time it should finally be CAF — 3 rather than 5 seems fair. And the funny thing is, the extra berths should go to CONMEBOL, and then UEFA based on rankings and ability of teams.

Let’s also not rule out that this could just be a “down year” for Europe. After two spectacular cups WC 2006 and Euro 2008, there very well may have been a complacency setting in on sides that had some success.

Yes, England and Italy and to a lesser extent France, Spain, Netherlands and Germany are all victims of their leagues success. And the thing is I don’t think investment at the youth level will work. What needs to happen never will. Sides should be forced to play a certain number of natives — Unless that happens, the talent will follow the money and national players will have a higher bar to top when trying to play in the big domestic leagues.

Reply

2 Rami S. June 29, 2010 at 11:52 am

David,

You make some good points but I think Asia deserves an extra spot and this could be done without changing the allocation of any other confederation. It’s quite simple move New Zealand and the few other small islands to Asia and give Asia the half spot which is disputed by both an Asian team and the winner of Oceania group which will be the Kiwis for a very long, long time.

As for European teams, it’s a common trend for Europeans to struggle outside Europe. Italy’s 4 titles came in Europe. France’s title came at home. England’s at home. Germany’s titles came in Europe as well.

South American teams tend to be the ones winning away from their Confederation as Brazil showed in WC2002 or in Sweden 1958.

In this tournament, the South American teams have been the best so far and if anything CONMEBOL deserves an extra spot like you mentioned. I’d take it away not from Africa but from CONCACAF as other than the USA and Mexico the other teams are poor.

As for the struggles of England, Italy and France those reasons are somewhat unrelated! England never really been a force with the only WC title coming at home some 44 years ago which puts them on level with France. England’s only big star is Rooney and he failed miserably in this WC. He has to be the tournament’s biggest disappointment and as he showed nothing in terms of the hunger and passion he displays for Man Utd. The other England player are mediocre at best with perhaps only Gerrard considered a quality player.

As for France, they’ve had many personal conflicts and the team was divided into groups within the squad itself. Gallas is also known for being a bad teammate in terms of his attitude as we’ve witnessed during his stint with Arsenal. The players did not get along with local duo Govou and Gourcuff who still play in France and Henry’s presence in the squad but mostly to warm the bench was controversial. And to make matters even worse, France had the worst Coach in the tournament in Raymond Domenech!

As for Italy, the Coach made a mistake by excluding one or perhaps two from Balotelli, Cassano, G. Rossi, Miccoli or even Totti. Marcello Lippi trusted too much in F. Cannavaro who was way past his best in Serie A while he was hit with key injuries to Buffon and Pirlo. If Buffon’s healthy, then Italy would probably have not conceded the other 4 goals on 5 shots on target. He’d probably save at least one of those 3 goals conceded against Slovakia.

There are different reasons for the struggles of these teams. While in England the media built the Three Lions to be a fierce monster prior to the World Cup, the Italian press clearly belittled and rightfully spoke of the Azzurri weaknesses. There’s a big difference there.

Finally, Italy have no influx of foreign born players or players with parents with mixed heritage or those who were born on home soil but of different background. Only Balotelli qualifies as one while France is full of them. Check how Desailly is following Ghana while Zidane was dividing his time between France and Algeria. The Germans who are still in the tournament have a number of those players and without them Germany would have probably not qualified for the WC. Just check Klose and Podolski (Poland), Cacau (Brazil), Ozil, Khedira and J. Boateng.

Reply

3 Adjoa S. June 30, 2010 at 2:09 am

I am West African; I’m from Ghana. I agree with the comment in the blog; “Learn some humility.” In general, on the world cup stage, the wealth of a country is not necessarily directly proportional to the football talent of its team/players. I am pretty sure the USA vastly underestimated the Ghanaian team (again), because they come from a poverty-stricken African country. Africa and Africans do not get respect for much. Granted, Ghana is not a football powerhouse like Brazil or Argentina, but if you look in the history books for the African Cup of Nations, and the FIFA junior under 17 and under-20 World Cups (which Ghana won most recently, BTW), we have featured quite prominently.
Moreover, when you look into the European Club teams, you will find quite a few Africans playing in some of the best teams in Europe, side-by-side with highly-regarded Europeans and South Americans; yet, no respect.

David, as to your comment “I’m pretty sure Africa has never had more than 1 make it to the round of 16,” that is true-per each world cup-, but we are getting better. So far, African countries have made it to the quarterfinals of the World Cup 3 times: Cameroon in 1990 (beating Colombia and Argentina on the way); Senegal in 2002 (beating France on the way), and now Ghana (beating favorites USA in R16). It is tough for us to get the resources to get these players back from Europe, to put these teams together, and pay the coaches, but it comes together. For many African countries, their chance to be seen (positively) on the world stage is the World Cup. That is also a chance for little boys (and girls) to cheer their countries on, and to temporarily put aside the daily worries and stress, and focus on something positive.
My uncle owns & coaches a youth team in Ghana, and I see talent come through his house and on the field every day. There is only so much money available to develop these guys’ talents. He still has been able to get some of these youngs guys out of abject poverty, to playing professional football and making a living for themselves and their families. So, there is a lot of talent in Africa; just look at the European club-and national- teams. Resources are being stretched to develop this talent at home, so I don’t think those 5 spots-for close to a billion people and 50+ countries-is a waste.
This is just my 2 cents as an avid female football fan.

Reply

4 Matt D July 1, 2010 at 1:04 pm

I see no proof that the US underestimated the Ghana team this time around. Is there any video, quotes or anything that shows a USMNT player or coach underestimating the game? Since Ghana sent the US packing back in 2006 it’s really hard to make that case. I think most people consider Ghana the best team in Africa from the last 2 world cups. Most likely, they will be an African favorite in the next.

Reply

5 Adjoa S. July 1, 2010 at 11:24 pm

Matt D, thanks for your comment. You are right; I do not recall any players or Bradley making any such comment. However, I don’t think it is a secret that the US was expected to win this one without much difficulty. There was a controversial goal for Ghana in the 2006 game that was thought to have given us a lucky win. I have listened to Lalas and other soccer commenters analyze the game; no one gave much credit to Ghana; the blame is largely placed on Bradley for not fielding the best/right players, and “fortuitous” Ghana goals being scored as a result of “US defender mistakes”. What goal isn’t typically a result of an opportunity due to a slip in defence? Anyway, that is now in the past. Ghana has a big game tomorrow. No doubt we are the underdogs-rightly so, Uruguay is a good side. I hope we can fight our way out of this one, win, and go to the semis. If not, good luck to Uruguay against Brazil. I think it would be fun to see countries other than Germany, France, Brazil, Argentina, or Italy contend seriously for the title.
Go Ghana!!!!

Reply

6 Rami S. July 1, 2010 at 11:36 pm

Matt & Adjoa,

Ghana is the most promising amongst the African nations in terms of talent (whether teams were in World Cup or not) and the Ghanaians showed it by reaching the Final of the African Cup of Nations and losing by a slim margin to the experienced Egyptians. While Egypt is perhaps Africa’s most balanced side today, the future will probably belong to Ghana as nations such as Cameroon and Nigeria are no longer the force they used to be.

To Ghana’s advantage, the key players on the Egyptian team are approaching retirement age while Ghana played both in the African tournament and the World Cup without M. Essien.

I even said before the WC2010 started that the absence of Essien wouldn’t affect the teams because the squad is made up of a group of players who work hard for the team.

The updated list below has Ghana on the poll and if you feel Ghana might win, you can vote here for the team:

http://www.worldcupbuzz.com/world-cup-2010-update-on-tournament-favourites/

Reply

7 Bill S July 3, 2010 at 1:57 pm

It’s not looking like such a bad year for Europe at the semi-final stage, is it?

Reply

8 John Boschini July 4, 2010 at 8:36 pm

But they are sides that haven’t been powerhouses on the international stage before now. The Netherlands and Spain haven’t won a World Cup and Germany is the model for how to invest in youth and have a healthy relationship with their club league.

Reply

9 Rami S. July 4, 2010 at 11:20 pm

Hi John,

Perhaps Spain or the Dutch will finally get to stitch a star to their shirts! Germans are the most consistent team in the history of the World Cup because they often seem to produce efficient, effective, hard working and solid sides.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: