8 Responses

  1. Bradley Richardson
    Bradley Richardson
    September 2, 2009 at 10:02 pm | | Reply


    I agree. I think that college athletics is such a big business that we in the US are brainwashed into thinking that something is wrong with developing adolescent children for profit of their own, instead of profit for the university. Another problem is US soccer is sometimes financially difficult due to the fact that their clinics and camps are expensive. Image-people in the US see soccer as an upper class sport instead of the street image of south america. The final reason is advertising. American television can’t handle the idea of only one commercial break during a match.

  2. Colin
    Colin
    September 3, 2009 at 12:42 am | | Reply


    What are some of the “ludicrous rules of the college game”?

    1. immadomenig
      immadomenig
      September 4, 2009 at 10:04 pm | | Reply


      the big difference is that they dont play 45 min clock running halves. its more like a basketball game with the clock stopping and starting and with 4 quarters

  3. paul
    paul
    September 3, 2009 at 6:03 am | | Reply


    I almost disagree with all of that. Nascar is far from exciting and still big, hockey is also low scoring. In america the only people I knew growing up who played soccer were people with money (ahem…soccer mom syndrom) game of the poor? Isn’t that boxing?. The reason soccer/lacrosse and certain sports aren’t big is because ESPN is a monopoly and (until like last week) never covered it. If a kid never sees players on tv, they aren’t going emmualate them. ESPN didn’t want us to follow soccer, because they can’t get their advertising dollars in, so they just pretended it didn’t exist.

  4. paul
    paul
    September 3, 2009 at 6:05 am | | Reply


    Brad, I have to disagree. People have no problem forcing their kids into sports for their own benefit in the us.

  5. Jake
    September 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm | | Reply


    paul,
    In your statements did you consider the following:
    -Nascar fans watch the races to see the crashes?
    -Hockey is a full-contact sport with many checks and a handful of fights?
    Also, hockey is not a low scoring game. Soccer may be a low scoring game but the scale is shifted way out of proportion. Take basketball (2/3 pts per “goal”) and [american] football (3/7 pts per “goal”). The scoring system vastly changes the desired outcome for the game. Soccer, hockey and lacrosse all have basically the same scoring structure and (aside from lacrosse where you are using a stick and a tiny ball to greatly increase the speed with which one can shoot) the end results of games are fairly the same.

    As for your comments about it being a game for the poor, that tidbit was about the general scheme of the world. In other parts of the world soccer can be played by anyone, anytime, anywhere. How many other sports can you play with no shoes, no real “goal”, no uniform/gear and a makeshift ball? Soccer is the cheapest sport to play hands down.

    Lastly, ESPN is bogus. How many times can you re-air the same SportsCenter or have multiple shows talking about the same player trades and other sports info and not actually show any real sports? FSC has maybe 5 hours a day of commentary, most of which is showing replays of the games and the rest is games or replays, GolTV is almost ALWAYS showing games or clips and Setanta is always showing something. ESPN has done to sports what MTV has done to “music television”. Instead of showing sports (what they were founded on and what their name still says they do) they play other garbage.

  6. Howdy
    Howdy
    September 6, 2009 at 12:02 pm | | Reply


    “Those of us who love futbol know that its takes great patience to watch 90 minutes of a match.”

    Eh? Not this lover of futbol.

    I mean, “great patience”? You’re describing it as if it’s a chore. You’re also buying into the idea that soccer has less “action” than other sports, and thus requires some sort of refined eye and temperament for properly appreciating the game’s nuances. That’s nuts. Soccer is basically nothing BUT action.

    “Honestly, poor people in the US live better than poor people in most other countries”

    Yes, indeed. In fact you could say that poor people in the United States live better than non-poor people in most other countries.

  7. Sinead
    September 8, 2009 at 8:44 am | | Reply


    It is getting more popular though. But there are loads of reasons why it will never take off fully. It’s not an American sport, it can be quite boring – 90mins not one goal! And it would take years to get American players up to the level of say Brazilian team who play soccer as soon as they can walk! Americans should just do what us Irish do – get people from other countries to play for us and pretend they’re Irish. Someone always has an Irish granny!

Leave a Reply