18 Responses

  1. SoccerFan
    SoccerFan
    November 21, 2009 at 4:19 pm | | Reply


    I vote Egypt, which was not in the poll. They are the most under-rated team out there. They know when to put the pressure on, and they will entertain you… win or lose.

    1. Rami S.
      Rami S.
      November 26, 2009 at 3:39 pm | | Reply


      Egypt performed well in the Confederations Cup but the national team suffered during the qualifiers. The lack of discipline amongst certain players (such as Mido and Zaki) also weakens the team’s chemistry. Some of the European teams such as Bosnia, Russia and Ireland would probably deserve more to be in South Africa 2010. The poll so far shows Mali is quite up there as well.

  2. Soccer Blog
    November 22, 2009 at 3:45 am | | Reply


    I think it’s pretty obvious that Ireland will be missed the most.

    1. Rami S.
      Rami S.
      November 26, 2009 at 3:36 pm | | Reply


      It looks like a close call between the Republic of Ireland and Mali according to readers.

    2. david
      david
      June 9, 2010 at 7:35 am | | Reply


      ireland should never gone out hope france loose on friday

  3. Kevin
    Kevin
    November 25, 2009 at 12:19 am | | Reply


    Come on. Croatia, easily.

    1. Rami S.
      Rami S.
      November 26, 2009 at 3:36 pm | | Reply


      Hello Kevin,

      The Croatians were easily dismantled by England and no longer have te same star power as they used to in the past. There are better teams which failed to qualify to South Africa 2010.

      1. Peter
        Peter
        January 22, 2010 at 12:00 am | | Reply


        Who is a better team missing the WC than Croatia and they are still ranked top 10 and have star players like Modric Eduardo Srna Kranjcar

  4. Rami S.
    Rami S.
    November 26, 2009 at 3:34 pm | | Reply


    It looks like the majority believe it is between Ireland and Mali which kind of make sense as the Irish were unfairly eliminated while Mali has a number of well-known players. The other teams like Sweden and Russia are good teams but perhaps just have one star player (Ibrahimovic and Arshavin respectively).

  5. Germany in world cup 2010
    February 14, 2010 at 7:27 am | | Reply


    Even though Egypt missed world cup 2010, they proved their talent by winning African cup 2010 title

  6. Rami S.
    Rami S.
    February 14, 2010 at 1:45 pm | | Reply


    Indeed, Egypt beat four countries which qualified to the World Cup but unfortunately for them they hit top form at the wrong time! If they were as solid, composed, efficient and determined in the qualifiers, they would have been present in South Africa 2010. It’s a shame because they showed they have the experience it takes to outfox opponents.

  7. Ivo
    Ivo
    April 20, 2010 at 11:31 pm | | Reply


    I have to go with Bulgaria…. They dominated the Irish and the only reason both games were tied were two individual mistakes where Dune scored. Also everybody complained about the goal France scored in the play-off well if anyone saw the goals that the Irish scored to beat Georgia they would be thinking everything comes back around. I see you didn’t mention Bulgaria but when it comes to offence – Berbatov (Man U) Bojinov (Parma) Martin Petrov (Man City) Stilian Petrov (Aston Villa) Rangelov (Dortmund) Domovchisky (Hertha) Manolev (PSV)……. other teams that would have been nice to see Russia, Czech, and Croatia, but i love that Slovenia and Slovakia are in, Btw i think that some regions such as Australian region (w/o Australia), Asia should lose 1 spot each (given to UEFA and Africa) and North and central america should join S, America it will actually make mexico and USA better because they will have to compete for a spot to the world cup.

    1. Rami S.
      Rami S.
      June 19, 2010 at 8:49 pm | | Reply


      Hi Ivo,

      One idea that you mention could be twisted a bit and could work. Just add all teams from Oceania to the Asian zone but don’t remove any World Cup spots from Asia and add Oceania’s with Asia’s so they actually have one more.

      Oceania’s number top team plays an Asian team in a playoff to qualify to WC. Simply add the Oceania teams to Asian Zone and give them one extra guaranteed spot. New Zealand qualified by playing against 5th place team in the Asian qualifiers.

      As for lumping all of the America qualifiers together, this could be an idea for the future since a league would not work for all these teams as they would have to play so many games considering he number of teams to be added such as USA, Canada, Mexico, Cuba, Costa Rica and others.

      I think best idea would be to lump to Oceania with Asia and give the newly formed Zone an extra guaranteed spot. This way no other region loses any sport.

  8. Bob
    Bob
    June 14, 2010 at 11:39 pm | | Reply


    Turkey & Russia are missing, also Columbia normally qualify

    1. Rami S.
      Rami S.
      June 15, 2010 at 1:00 am | | Reply


      Hello Bob,

      I think Russia is probably the team to be missed the most considering the team’s spot in the World Cup has been taken by Slovenia which I deem as one of the less impressive sides in South Africa 2010. That’s why football games are played because in 90 minutes anything can happen and the better teams do not always win. I can be reached at Twitter if you have any further comments: @Rami Soufi
      Did you think of who is the best player missing from the tournament? Here’s a link if you’d like to check:

      http://www.worldcupbuzz.com/the-best-players-to-miss-on-south-africa-2010/

      Thank you and enjoy the World Cup!

  9. Lula
    Lula
    June 17, 2010 at 8:27 pm | | Reply


    And how about Colombia? Colombia had to be there too.

    1. Rami S.
      Rami S.
      June 18, 2010 at 5:22 am | | Reply


      Hi Lula,

      The South American teams are actually achieving the best results so far in the World Cup with 5 win and 2 draws while avoiding defeat.

      Obviously Brazil and Argentina (even if Maradona’s team suffered in the qualifiers) are two of the most talented teams in the world. Paraguay held world champions Italy to a draw in the first (and also beat both Brazil and Argentina in the qualifiers).

      This leaves Chile who won their first match and Uruguay who held France to a draw. These teams are in South Africa 2010 for a reason and I believe it is due to their better results in the qualifiers. Only Uruguay was a single point ahead of Colombia while the next team above Uruguay was Argentina with 5 points ahead of the Colombians. In addition, Ecuador ended the qualifiers with the same points as Colombia but ahead on goal difference which shows how competitive the qualifiers were. In conclusion, I think there are other teams who were more worthy of being in South Africa yet they missed out too.

  10. gracelee
    June 30, 2010 at 8:05 am | | Reply


    I dont even know that! Thanks for telling us. Sorry for Turkey!

Leave a Reply